@characterdrivenactive 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
James Corbett Audio
Posted on January 18, 2018
This is audio from a podcast aired in 2011 which Dr. Judy Wood will be using as a basis for today’s discussion about James Corbett of The Corbett Report. The transcript is included as a resource to help listeners to refer to specific wording and context.
Transcript: James Corbett, 6/11/2011
JC: Let’s move on to an email from Anthony who writes, “I have yet to hear you comment on the split in the 9/11 Research Movement between the ideas of Dr. Judy Wood and her energy weapon theory and Professor Steven Jones who backs the thermite theory. Do you lend any support to Dr. Wood’s ideas or research? “
Right. Very good question Anthony and I’m sure it’s one that many people out there have. So let me be as clear as I can.
I do not support mini nukes.
I do not support TV fakery.
I do not support no planes.
I do not support VicSims.
And I do not support Mystery Magical Energy Beams from Outer Space.
And I don’t know how much more clear I can get, and that’s not to say – and please don’t take that as me[sic] saying that I 100% unequivically believe that the thermite story is the correct story. In fact I have my reservations about that as well.
Personally, ultimately on this question there are a lot of really fascinating and interesting distractions out there from some of the real issues of 9/11. And it’s something I’ve been saying for years now, and continue to stress that I think that a lot of physical anomalies of what happened on 9/11 are ways to keep people in endless infighting arguments about this and that little …part of this or that theory “You don’t support this research” and “Oh my god you must be cointelpro. You must be part of the New World Order.”
Well, if that’s the level of discourse in which you want to participate than go right ahead and stop listening to me right now. But ultimately I think we have to stop… We have to go beyond the physical anomalies of 9/11 and look at the grand context of 9/11. That’s something that I’ve stressed over and over and it starts with things like following the money trail for 9/11 and looking at the air defenses on 9/11 and looking at the big players on 9/11.
Again, there’s way too much to go into right now, but suffice it to say, I think a lot of these ideas, whether consciously put out there by cointelpro-type people to split up the movement or not ultimately has that effect. It doesn’t really matter if it’s government funded or not.
That’s pretty much all I have to say about that at the moment.
People can continue to send me links to all of these interesting ideas about the interesting ways the towers were brought down – and I’ll continue to look at them but I haven’t seen a single thing that’s convinced me yet of any of these…. these theories. And I… well doubt that I’m likely to. But again, keep sending it in and I’ll take a look at it.